|
|
|
The BadAds Weblog: August 2003
Weblog Archives
Ad Defacement as Free Expression?
The Los Angeles Times ran an
interesting editorial on August 25, 2003 in which the author advocates defacing
billboards as a means of self-expression. Crispin Sartwell's "Graffiti
Gets Philosophical" focuses on the work of artist Ron English, who repaints
billboards with subversive messages ("Jesus drove an SUV, Mohammed pumped his
gas. Hummer: Not Your Daddy's War Wagon.").
While not endorsing English's
politics, Sartwell does suggest the rest of us common folk pick up a paint
brush and fight back against corporate speech: "Advertising is the public
expression of wealthy people and organizations. Graffiti is the public
expression of people who are more or less broke. [W]hat I do endorse is
the art of graffiti and the concept of culture jamming. If advertisers feel
free to monopolize public space from highways to the airwaves to the
Internet with their commercial messages, we ought to feel free to deface
these messages, critique them and replace them with our own."
You must log in to the LATimes.com
site to read the editorial, but thanks to an anonymous online subverter, you
can use "BadAds" as the username and "badads" as the password. (If these don't
work, you'll have to slap in your credentials, or reasonable approximations
thereof, and create your own username.) We look forward to seeing both you and
your paintbrush on the streets.
August 28, 2003
Sneakier and Sneakier
What's worse than finding an ad in
unwanted places? Having a marketer tell you that the ad isn't intrusive because
you asked to see it.
Unfortunately, businesses do this all
the time, making it the customer's responsibility to avoid becoming an ad
magnet. Subscribe to a magazine, and the publisher will sell your name and
address to another; fill out a warranty card, and the manufacturer will send
you "valuable" coupons for other merchandise; shop at stores like Toys R Us and
Linens 'n' Things, where the cashiers ask for your phone number as if they have
a right to it, and your mailbox will fill with catalogs and notices of special
sales events.
Alert BadAds readers have submitted
two new instances of sneaky marketers who have found ways of hitting us with
ads after receiving our "permission" to do so. First, Mike C. forwarded the
following message from a co-worker:
"This is to all of you that signed up
for the 'do not call' law. This week I received a card in the mail that said,
'Vote for your favorite cola Pepsi or Coke and receive a
complementary 12 pack.' At the bottom of the card there is a VERY small
statement that says, 'By completing this form, you agree that sponsors and
cosponsors of this offer may telephone you , even if your number is found on a
do not call registry or list.'
"This REALLY upset me and I just
wanted all my friends to be aware of this way to get around the 'do not call'
la w!! Just think how many people will send this in and their 'do not call'
registry will be NO GOOD!! The company's name is MARKET SOLUTION. I think this
is just one sample of what we will get in the future, so READ EVERYTHING before
you SIGN AND SEND."
Even after you join the "do not call"
registry, any company that has a "prior business relationship" with you can
still phone for up to 18 months, unless you specifically tell them to stop, and
this loosely-defined relationship can be established by nearly anything you do
to contact the company.
According to Snopes.com, other
companies are trying this sneaky tactic. For example, if you register for the
Liquid Soap Company's Ecology First Sweepstakes, the rules state, "By
completing this form, you agree that sponsors and co-sponsors of this
Sweepstakes may telephone you, even if your number is found on a do not call
registry or list." You can send your complaint to
lsp@liquidsoapproducts.com.
As another example of sneaky
advertising, BadAds reader K.L. offers this story of marketing woe:
"You know those cool new car radios
that display song titles and artist information on the LCD display with
particular radio stations that provide the 'information' service? Clear Channel
Communications radio stations (among others) have been selling advertising to
the car radio's LCD display!! I saw scrolling ads and phone numbers for a local
florist, and a couple other businesses.
"Clear Channel made it extremely
difficult to find someone to complain to. They of course blew me off. When
Toyota called to ask how I liked my new car, I told them about it, but of
course they never called back as they had promised to do. I asked them to tell
me how to disable the transmitted text display, but they have not
responded."
Ouch where you see a cool use
of technology that provides useful information, marketers see only another tool
to subject you to the "information" they find important.
Please contact Clear Channel's radio
PR person, Lisa Dollinger, at lisadollinger@clearchannel.com.
To complain to Toyota about their use of advertising radio displays,
fill out their contact form.
Anyone who can help out K.L. or who has intrusive advertising
stories of their own is welcome to e-mail us.
We'll post these on our feedback page so that others can learn from your sob
stories.
August 18, 2003
Back to the Main Page
- - - - - - - - - -
Get the BadAds Weblog updates via e-mail! We'll keep you up-to-date on news in
intrusive advertising, changes to BadAds.org, and new ways you can fight "ad
creep."
JOIN NOW
|
|
|
What Makes an Ad Bad?
Where you draw the line is up to you but we feel that an ad meeting any one of the following criteria qualifies as intrusive:
1. You can't turn it off. You can close a magazine and turn off the television, but billboards tower overhead night and day.
2. It enters your home without permission. Pardon me, Mr. Telemarketer, may I see your invitation?
3. You're a captive audience. This can be in schools, in movie theaters, at a urinal, or waiting for your receipt at the ATM.
4. It doesn't support anything, or it costs you money. Radio ads support free programming, but you pay, directly or indirectly, for faxed ads and junk e-mail.
|
|